Review of Coming to Grips with Genesis: Biblical Authority and the Age of the Earth by Terry Mortenson

Chapter 2 A Brief Overview of the Exegesis of Genesis 1-11: Luther to Lyell

David Hall summarizes his chapter: “What follows is a summary of the most noteworthy theologians from 1500 to roughly 1830 (about the time of Charles Lyell, the figurehead leader of the geological theory of deep time).[1]

Hall notes importantly: “When one considers the totality of primary sources, rather than the unsubstantiated claims of modern proponents of old-earth creationism, we will see that Martin Luther, John Calvin, the Westminster Divines, John Wesley, and the like are no friends of deep time or gradual creation.”[2]

The Protestant Reformers

I am only going to quote John Calvin as representative of the Protestant Reformers: “We are drawn away from all fictions to the only God who distributed his work into six days that we might not find it irksome to occupy our whole life in contemplating it.”[3] On the age of the earth, Calvin contended that the genealogies in Genesis 5 and 11 were strict chronologies (with no gaps).[4] Thomas Constable agrees with Calvin on the genealogy in Genesis: The careful recording of the age of each man when he fathered the next man in the list strongly suggests that this list is complete. Furthermore, the genealogies in 1 Chronicles 1:1-4 and Luke 3:36-38 are identical to the one in Genesis 5. There are probably no missing generations. As well as Keil and Delitzsch, 1:120-27.[5]

From Calvin to Ussher

Next, Hall quotes an impressive succession of Genevan scholars, including Theodore Beza (1519-1605), Wolfgang Musculus (1497-1563), Peter Martyr (1499-1562), and Francois Homan. I am going to cite Peter Martyr as typical of this period: “The evening and the morning were made the first days of the gathering together forth of light before the bringing forth of the sunne ....When we speak of the creation of things, we bring not forth one thing out of another after Aristotle’s manner, but we affirm all natures, as well bodies with bodies [angels, demons], to be created of another by the word of God.”[6]

Continental Reformed Theologians, 1590-1690

Zacharius Ursinus (1534-1583) speaks for many Reformers of this era. Ursinus was a student of Philip Melanchthon and wrote a commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism. Ursinus became a professor at Heidelberg in 1561. The catechism was published anonymously in 1563, but many contend he was the main contributor to writing the famous catechism.[7] In his commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism, he wrote, “According to the common reckoning, it is now counting from this 1616 of Christ, 5534 years since the creation of the world.[8]

British Puritan Exegetes

“Cambridge Fellow, William Perkins (1558-1602), was a puritan, polemicist, and preacher par excellence. His works at the height of British Puritanism became as popular as Calvin’s.”[9] On the time and days of creation, Perkins wrote: “The sixth shall be touching the tme of the beginning of the world, which is between five thousand and sixe thousand years a goe.... God could have made the world, and all things in it in one moment: but hee began and finished the whole worke in sixe distinct dates.... for the light was made the first day: but the Sune, the Moone, and the Stars were not created before the fourth day.”[10]

Reformed Theologians a Century after Westminster, 1640-1740

Hall cited one of the darlings of Reformed theologians: “Writing in 1679, Francis Turretin noted, but then rejected, the Augustinian view and sided with Ussher: ‘Nor does the sacred history written by Moses cover any more than six thousand years .... Greek history scarcely contains the history of two thousand years.’ Tuerritn went so far as to commend Ussher and others for specifying that creation happened in autumn, not spring.”[11]

Wesley and Early 19th Century Commentaries

[John] Wesley never wrote extensively on creation or the Flood, but in this work, he stated his belief that the various rock strata were “doubtless formed by the general Deluge” of Noah’s day.[12] On the age of the earth, Wesley declared: “The Scripture being the only Book in the world that gives us any account of the whole series of God’s Dispensations toward man from the Creation for four thousand years.”[13]

Joining the Church Fathers, the Reformers also advocated six-twenty-four days of creation, approximately six thousand years ago. Thus, the Great Tradition is a young earth.

[1] Terry Mortenson, Coming to Grips with Genesis (p. 54).

[2] Ibid., 55.

[3] Ibid., 56.

[4] Calvin, Genesis, p.76

[5] Thomas Constable, Netbible.org

[6] Terry Mortenson, Coming to Grips with Genesis, 62.

[7] Zacharius Ursinus: The Happy Professor

[8] Zacharius Ursinus, Commentary to the Heidelberg Confession, (Columbus: Scott and Bascom Printers, 1852).

[9] Terry Mortenson, Coming to Grips with Genesis (p. 68).

[10] William Perkins, An Exposition of the Creede, 1:143.

[11] Terry Mortenson, Coming to Grips with Genesis 71.

[12]  Ibid.,74.

[13] Wesley, Survey of the Wisdom of God in the Creation, II:227.

  

 

Review of Coming to Grips with Genesis: Biblical Authority and the Age of the Earth by Terry Mortenson

Hugh Ross wrote that “many of the early Church Fathers and other biblical scholars interpreted the creation days of Genesis 1 as long periods of time.”[1] However, the Church Fathers endorsed a six-twenty-four-day creation to combat “Greek thought [that] included kinds of evolutionary and uniformitarian concepts even before the time of Christ.”[2]

For example, Lactantius (c A.D. 250-325), a rhetorician who tutored Constantine’s son wrote, “Plato and many others of the philosophers, since their ignorance of the origin of all things, and of that primal period at which the world was made, said that many thousands of ages had passed since this beautiful arrangement of the world was completed .... Therefore let the philosophers, who enumerated thousands of ages from the beginning of the world, know that the six thousandth year is not yet completed.”[3]

Read more

Review of Coming to Grips with Genesis: Biblical Authority and the Age of the Earth by Terry Mortenson (Foreword)

In the Foreword, Henry M. Morris writes “that there are many good scientific evidences pointing to special creation, a young earth, and the global Flood, and these have been persuasively advanced by creationist scientists in debates, seminars, and conferences for many years and with great results.  But the compelling and definitive evidences are biblical, not scientific.” Why is this observation true? Because “No one has ever observed any genuine evolution taking place (macro-evolution) in the thousands of years of recorded history --- so it is certainly not a part of observational science (and real science should involve observation and repetition) .... Furthermore, despite certain disputable claims, no one has ever demonstrated an authentic evolutionary transitional series among all the billions of fossils preserved in the sedimentary rocks of the earth’s crust.”

Read more

The “Dreadful” Doctrine of Double Predestination

My mom heard a pastor preach on the subject of double predestination or reprobation, that God predestined or ordained some people to salvation and God ordained others to hell. The manner in which this preacher taught this subject left my mom in total despair over the salvation of some of her loved ones. The Scriptures do not leave believers in despair. God was not teasing in his Word when he declared, “Whosoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting life” (Jo 3:16).

I agree with John Calvin that the doctrine of double predestination or reprobation is a “dreadful” doctrine. Calvin, in his The Institutes of the Christian Religion, wrote: “The decree, I admit, is dreadful.” [1] However, I disagree with John Calvin that this “dreadful” doctrine is biblical.

Read more

Is Gambling Sin? Part Two

The Southern Baptist Convention, in an official statement entitled, On the Sin of Gambling [click to open], declared:

The Southern Baptist Convention has a long history of opposing gambling in its various forms, such as casinos, lotteries, racing, and other gambling schemes; and WHEREAS, Gambling violates the principle of neighbor-love, necessitating the financial loss and harm of many for the gain of a few, enjoying entertainment at the expense of others (Exodus 20:17; 22:21; Leviticus 25:17; Deuteronomy 22:1–4; Matthew 22:39; Mark 12:31; Romans 13:8–10; Galatians 5:14; James 2:8). The SBC made nine declarations against the sin of gambling.

Read more

Is Gambling Sin? Part One

John Piper received this question in Ask Pastor John: “Hello Pastor John .... The bets I place are rather modest at $20–$50 a week. Is modest online sports gambling sinful?”[1] I will return later to give Piper’s answer. I quote this young man to show that this is an important question that is often asked.

Maura J. Casey wrote a devastating article titled "Gambling with Lives." Casey relates some personal gambling tragedies:

A friend of mine told me that to escape the burdens of motherhood she would go to the casinos at 2 A.M. to gamble until 6:30 A.M., when she would go back home and get her kids ready for school. Until the day she didn’t go home in time—unable to stop playing the slots. A worried state legislator called to tell me her husband emptied her sixteen-year-old son’s college fund to gamble at the casinos. A bank manager told me about a customer who inherited $1 million and—aided by using the ATM machines at the casino to withdraw money—gambled it all away. A woman who worked at my daughter’s day care moved her family to Florida in a desperate attempt at a geographic cure after her husband drained money from his ten-year-old’s savings account and couldn’t stop going to the area casinos.[2]

Read more

Is There Healing in The Atonement?

Some Bible teachers advocate that there is healing in the atonement of Jesus on the cross based on 1 Peter 2:24: “By whose stripes we are healed.” Can you imagine the audience of Peter who were suffering persecution for their faith and witness being confused if Peter was teaching because of Jesus’ atonement, you should not be suffering. These persecuted believers were not suffering because of a lack of faith or sin. Additionally, they would have been equally confused because some of their loved ones had died. People don’t of good health.[1]

Read more

The Exclusivity of Jesus Christ, Part Two

The Christian apologist, John Lennox, who holds a Ph.D. from Oxford and another from Cambridge, rightfully contends that Christianity is distinct from every other religion. All of the religions of the world teach that the unsaved must do religious works and earn God’s acceptance somewhere in the future. Christianity teaches that when we “believe,” which is an act of our will to receive Christ as our Savior, God accepts us right then, and then we work for him.

Lennox tells how he proposed to his wife, Sally. When he proposed, he handed her a cookbook and said, If you cook more good meals than bad meals over the next 40 years, I will accept you, and we can get married. Not really; he was illustrating what the world's religions advocate.

That is what the world's religions teach. Acceptance has to be earned and is at the end of someone’s life only if the unsaved has performed more good works than bad works.

Read more

The Exclusivity of Jesus Christ, Part One

In John 14:6, Jesus made an eternally important declaration about salvation: “I am the only way to salvation or heaven.” I was talking to my friend Keith Thrasher about this sermon on John 14:6. He told me that the Lord used John 14:6 to lead him to salvation. Keith was more agnostic before salvation. In 2005, He was working at the Illinois Department of Corrections in a maximum-security facility, the same prison that housed the state’s death row.

Read more

Factual Data on Isaiah

One of the main prophets and/or leaders in the Kansas City Prophets movement was Bob Jones (no relation to Bob Jones of Bob Jones University in South Carolina), the movement's visionary.  He was said to have been specially anointed with supernatural visions from the Lord and a prophetic gift.  However, he was quoted as saying that the general level of prophetic revelation in the movement's "prophets" had an accuracy level of about 65 percent.  He said some prophets were as low as 10 percent accurate, with some of the "most mature" prophets having a rating "approaching 85 percent to 95 percent." [1]

Deuteronomy 18:20-23 is the test of a prophet in the OT. A biblical prophet has an accuracy rate of 100 percent.

Read more

Was Charlie Kirk Martyred?

Charlie Kirk was hated! The man that Charlie Kirk called pastor said that Charlie Kirk received death threats every day. That is why he had a security detail. The parents of the man who allegedly shot Charlie Kirk said their son had become more political and obsessed with Charlie Kirk. Hear what Jesus Christ said to his followers: “If the world hate you, you know that it hated me before it hated you” (John 15:18).

Read more

Review of Paul Scott Wilson's Law-Gospel View

Paul Scott Wilson presents his view of interpreting and preaching called the Law-Gospel view in Scott M. Gibson’s and Matthew D. Kim’s Homiletics and Hermeneutics (Baker Publishing Group, Kindle Edition, 2018). Wilson’s one text, one theme, one doctrine, one need, one image, and one mission is just another way of saying what many homileticians describe as one preaching unit or the text (one text), one MPS (one theme), Argumentation (one doctrine), Interest Step in the Introduction (one need), Illustration (one image), and Application (one mission).

Read more

How to Study Parables! (Part Two)

Craig Blomberg refers to one of his colleagues, Professor Elodie Emig, who “once suggested to me a remarkably concise big idea that incorporates all three lessons of the similarly structured parable of the two sons in Matthew 21:28-32. In this parable in which a son who refuses to work in his father’s vineyard later changes his mind and goes to the vineyard, in which a son who says he will work in fact doesn’t, and in which the father pronounces the former rather that the latter as having done his will, the three prongs of the passage can be neatly summed up with the affirmation, “Performance takes priority over promise.”[1] 

Read more

Jesus used shock value in his parables

I had a homiletics teacher, Steve Brown, who taught us, that if you have a thought in the study that you think is to bold or shocking to say in the pulpit, say it. I would not go that far. But Jesus, in his parables, did make some shocking statements or at least introduced the element of surprise. Craig Blomberg acknowledged this dimension of parables: “More often than not, there was a surprising reversal between the character a first-century Jewish audience would have expected to be the hero or good example and the one who actually turned out to play that role.”[1]

Read more

Review of Bryan Chapell's Redemptive-Historic View

This post is a review of “Redemptive-Historic View” by Bryan Chapell in Scott M. Gibson’s and Matthew D.  Kim’s Homiletics and Hermeneutics: Four Views on Preaching Today.

I agree with Bryan Chapell when he warns that the redemptive-historical view of forcing Christ into every text has “been abused, in ways that are now obvious to us, by ancient allegorism that sought to make Jesus ‘magically’ appear in every Bible passage through exegetical acrobatics that stretched logic, imagination, and credulity.”[1] This is a candid admission.

Read more

How do you study parables? (Part One)

Craig L. Blomberg in his Preaching the Parables noted: “Preaching a parable is a novice preacher’s dream, but often an experienced preacher’s nightmare .... At first glance, the parables appear familiar and straightforward, but thoughtful students soon realize they have fallen into a quagmire of interpretive debates.”[1]

Read more

Is There Healing in the Atonement?

Some Bible teachers advocate that there is healing in the atonement of Jesus’ on the cross based on 1 Peter 2:24: “By whose strips we are healed.” Can you imagine the audience of Peter who were suffering persecution for thier faith and witness being confused if Peter was teaching because of Jesus’ atonement you should not be suffering. These persecuted believers were not suffering because of a lack of faith or sin. Additionally, they would have been equally confused because some of their loved ones had died. People don’t of good health.[1]

Read more

How can employees work for difficult bosses

Peter tells Christians to be subject to difficult bosses in 1 Peter 2:18-20. Here is an illustration for this text provided by Steven Cole at preceptaustion.org on this passage. One way to apply this is consciously to recognize that you don’t work primarily for your employer; you work for God. Howard Hendricks tells the story of being on an airliner that was delayed on the ground. Passengers grew increasingly impatient. One obnoxious man kept venting his frustrations on the stewardess. But she responded graciously and courteously in spite of his abuse.

Read more

Review of Abraham Kuruvilla's Christiconic View

This is a review of Abraham Kuruvilla’s “Christiconic View” in Hermeneutics and Homiletics: Four Views of Preaching. Kuruvilla brings some crucial corrections to the Christocentric view, but he also agrees with it on other points. This review will highlight these differences.

Read more

A Review of Kenneth Langley's Theocentric Hermeneutic

I appreciate and agree with Kenneth Langley’s opening statement: “Preaching should be God centered because God is God centered and wants us to be God centered in everything we do. All God does he does for his glory, and all we do—eating, drinking, and certainly preaching—we do for his glory (1 Cor. 10:31).”[1] I also like the way he refuted authors like Christocentric preachers like Tim Keller, C. J. Mahaney, and Edmund Clowney who contended that David is prophetic of his Greater Son. Langley responded, “I disagree that ‘it is impossible not to see Christ in his passage.’”

Read more